2009 |
Dimitrios Dimitriadis, Alexandros Potamianos, Petros Maragos A comparison of the squared energy and teager-kaiser operators for short-term energy estimation in additive noise Journal Article IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 57 (7), pp. 2569–2581, 2009, ISSN: 1053587X. Abstract | BibTeX | Links: [PDF] @article{132, title = {A comparison of the squared energy and teager-kaiser operators for short-term energy estimation in additive noise}, author = {Dimitrios Dimitriadis and Alexandros Potamianos and Petros Maragos}, url = {http://robotics.ntua.gr/wp-content/uploads/publications/DimitriadisPotamianosMaragos_ComparisonSquaredAmpl-TKOper-EnergyEstimation_ieeetSP2008.pdf}, doi = {10.1109/TSP.2009.2019299}, issn = {1053587X}, year = {2009}, date = {2009-01-01}, journal = {IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing}, volume = {57}, number = {7}, pages = {2569--2581}, abstract = {Time-frequency distributions that evaluate the signal's energy content both in the time and frequency domains are indispensable signal processing tools, especially, for nonstationary signals. Various short-time energy computation schemes are used in practice, including the mean squared amplitude and Teager-Kaiser energy approaches. Herein, we focus primarily on the short- and medium-term properties of these two energy estimation schemes, as well as, on their performance in the presence of additive noise. To facilitate this analysis and generalize the approach, we use a harmonic noise model to approximate the noise component. The error analysis is conducted both in the continuous- and discrete-time domains, deriving similar conclusions. The estimation errors are measured in terms of normalized deviations from the expected signal energy and are shown to greatly depend on both the signals' spectral content and the analysis window length. When medium- and long-term analysis windows are employed, the Teager-Kaiser energy operator is proven superior to the common squared energy operator, provided that the spectral content of the noise is more lowpass than the corresponding signal content, and vice versa. However, for shorter window lengths, the Teager-Kaiser operator always outperforms the squared energy operator. The theoretical results are experimentally verified for synthetic signals. Finally, the performance of the proposed energy operators is evaluated for short-term analysis of noisy speech signals and the implications for speech processing applications are outlined.}, keywords = {}, pubstate = {published}, tppubtype = {article} } Time-frequency distributions that evaluate the signal's energy content both in the time and frequency domains are indispensable signal processing tools, especially, for nonstationary signals. Various short-time energy computation schemes are used in practice, including the mean squared amplitude and Teager-Kaiser energy approaches. Herein, we focus primarily on the short- and medium-term properties of these two energy estimation schemes, as well as, on their performance in the presence of additive noise. To facilitate this analysis and generalize the approach, we use a harmonic noise model to approximate the noise component. The error analysis is conducted both in the continuous- and discrete-time domains, deriving similar conclusions. The estimation errors are measured in terms of normalized deviations from the expected signal energy and are shown to greatly depend on both the signals' spectral content and the analysis window length. When medium- and long-term analysis windows are employed, the Teager-Kaiser energy operator is proven superior to the common squared energy operator, provided that the spectral content of the noise is more lowpass than the corresponding signal content, and vice versa. However, for shorter window lengths, the Teager-Kaiser operator always outperforms the squared energy operator. The theoretical results are experimentally verified for synthetic signals. Finally, the performance of the proposed energy operators is evaluated for short-term analysis of noisy speech signals and the implications for speech processing applications are outlined. |
Copyright Notice:
Some material presented is available for download to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author’s copyright. In most cases, these works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.
The work already published by the IEEE is under its copyright. Personal use of such material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish the material for advertising or promotional purposes, or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of the work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.